Forthcoming Articles
Perspective

Why Pronatalism Fails the Planetary Health Test

Celine Delacroix
University of Ottawa
Marleen Temmerman
Aga Khan University
Nandita Bajaj
Antioch University
Ann Moore
Guttmacher Institute
Phoebe Barnard
University of Cape Town
William Ripple
Oregon State University
William Rees
University of British Columbia
Michael Gerrard
Columbia Law School
Diana Coole
Birkbeck, University of London
Robert Engelman
Population Institute
Helen Kopnina
Northumbria University
Nkechi Owoo
University of Ghana
Peter Lindsey
University of Pretoria

Published 2026-07-07

Keywords

  • planetary health,
  • planetary boundaries,
  • pronatalism

How to Cite

Delacroix, Celine, Marleen Temmerman, Nandita Bajaj, Ann Moore, Phoebe Barnard, William Ripple, William Rees, Michael Gerrard, Diana Coole, Robert Engelman, Helen Kopnina, Nkechi Owoo, and Peter Lindsey. 2026. “Why Pronatalism Fails the Planetary Health Test”. The Journal of Population and Sustainability, July. https://doi.org/10.3197/whpjps.63887831800459.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bajaj, N. and K. Stade. 2023. ‘Challenging pronatalism is key to advancing reproductive rights and a sustainable population’. Journal of Population and Sustainability 7: 39–70. https://doi.org/10.3197/JPS.63799953906861
  2. Dowd, J. 2025. ‘Is our population collapsing?’ Data for Health, 21 May. https://jenndowd.substack.com/p/is-our-population-collapsing (accessed 6 June 2025).
  3. Götmark, F. and M. Andersson. 2023. ‘Achieving sustainable population: Fertility decline in many developing countries follows modern contraception, not economic growth’. Sustainable Development 31: 1606–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2470
  4. Madani, K. 2026. Global Water Bankruptcy: Living Beyond Our Hydrological Means in the Post-Crisis Era. Richmond Hill, Ontario: United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health.
  5. Ripple, W.J., C. Wolf, J.W. Gregg, K. Levin, J. Rockström, T.M. Newsome, et al. 2022. ‘World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency 2022’. BioScience 72: 895–902. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac083
  6. Shukla, P.R., J. Skea, R. Slade, R. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum et al. 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Singh, S., G. Sedgh, E.A. Sully, O. Owolabi and J. Wittenberg. 2025. ‘Protecting global sexual and reproductive health and rights in the face of retrograde US policies and positions’. The Lancet 405: 1650–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00618-X
  8. Skirbekk, V. 2022. Decline and Prosper!: Changing Global Birth Rates and the Advantages of Fewer Children. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91611-4
  9. Taylor, M. 2026. ‘Global economy must move past GDP to avoid planetary disaster, warns UN chief’. The Guardian, 9 February. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/feb/09/global-economy-transformed-humanity-future-un-chief-antonio-guterres (accessed 12 February 2026).
  10. United Nations. 2024. World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2024/TR/NO.9. New York: United Nations.
  11. United Nations. 2025. World Fertility 2024. UN DESA/POP/2024/TR/NO.11. New York: United Nations.
  12. United Nations Population Fund. 2022. Seeing the Unseen: State of World Population 2022 – The Case for Action in the Neglected Crisis of Unintended Pregnancy. New York: United Nations Population Fund.