Essential yet overlooked: Faculty insights on integrating population dynamics into university curricula
Published 2026-01-29
Keywords
- Population dynamics,
- Demography,
- Higher education,
- Teaching demography,
- Undergraduate curricula
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 Celine Delacroix, Paige Passano, Matt Matusiewicz, Nicole Bergen, Ndola Prata

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Population dynamics play a pivotal role in development, exacerbating social, economic and environmental challenges. Yet, this factor remains largely understudied in undergraduate curricula in the United States. This study explores the perceptions of University of California (UC) faculty of the concept of population dynamics and its integration into their teaching. Through a mixed-methods approach, it investigates the meanings that faculty associate with this concept, the importance they attribute to it, and the barriers they face in teaching it. Findings reveal that UC faculty across multiple disciplines believe that understanding this topic is essential for college students’ future careers. However, study participants reported that population dynamics were infrequently integrated into undergraduate courses due to their interdisciplinary nature, lack of faculty training in demography and lack of prioritisation by the UC system. Other barriers to teaching this topic include the sensitive nature of associated themes like migration, family planning and gender norms. Our findings suggest that the teaching of this subject, as well as its integration into the curriculum, lacks a systematic and coordinated approach. Its inclusion (or lack thereof) depends largely on individual faculty’s preferences and their level of demographic expertise. The gap between its perceived importance and its representation in the curriculum highlights the need for universities to make a more consistent effort to support faculty in integrating this topic in meaningful ways. Adequate coverage of population dynamics within institutions of higher education will help students to increase awareness and contribute to efforts to address global demographic challenges.
Downloads
References
- Burch, T.K. (2018). ‘Teaching demography: Ten principles and two rationales’. In T.K. Burch (ed.) Model-Based Demography: Essays on Integrating Data, Technique and Theory, pp. 155–66. Springer International Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-65433-8_11
- Coole, D. 2021. ‘The toxification of population discourse. A genealogical study’. The Journal of Development Studies 57 (9): 1454–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00 220388.2021.1915479
- Delacroix, C. and R. Engelman. 2023. ‘Empowered, smaller families are better for the planet: How to talk about family planning and environmental sustainability’. Social Change 53 (3): 364–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/00490857231187993
- Ehrlich, P.R. 1968. The Population Bomb. New York. Ballantine Book Publication.
- McDonald, P. 2014. ‘What is demography?’ International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. https://iussp.org/en/what-demography-peter-mcdonald
- McFarlane, D.R., and W.L. Hansen. 2023. Assessing Basic Demographic Literacy Among Undergraduate Political Science Students: Why It Matters and How to Improve It. Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April.
- Merli, M.G., J. Moody, A. Verdery and M. Yacoub. 2023. ‘Demography’s changing intellectual landscape: A bibliometric analysis of the leading Anglophone journals, 1950–2020’. Demography 60 (3): 865–890. https://doi. org/10.1215/00703370-10714127
- NextGenPop. 2024. NextGenPop. https://nextgenpop.org/
- O’Neill, B.C., M. Dalton, R. Fuchs, L. Jiang, S. Pachauri and K. Zigova. 2010. ‘Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (41): 17521–26. https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004581107
- Palloni, A. 2002. ‘Rethinking the teaching of demography: New challenges and opportunities’. Genus 58 (3/4): 35–70.
- Ripple, W.J., C. Wolf, J.W. Gregg, K. Levin … and L. Kemp. 2022. World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency 2022. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article-abstract/72/12/1149/6764747
- Ripple, W.J., C. Wolf, J.W. Gregg, J. Rockström … and S.D.A. King. 2023. ‘The 2023 state of the climate report: Entering uncharted territory’. BioScience 73 (12): 841–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad080
- Scranton, R. 2025. ‘Misunderstood Malthus: The English thinker whose name is synonymous with doom and gloom has lessons for today’. The Conversation, 22 August. https://doi.org/10.64628/AAI.vy5nhngr9
- Speidel, J.J. and J.N. Sullivan. 2023. ‘Advancing the welfare of people and the planet with a common agenda for reproductive justice, population, and the environment’. World 4 (2): 259–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/world4020018
- Tabutin, D. and R. Depledge. 2007. ‘Whither demography? Strengths and weaknesses of the discipline over fifty years of change’. Population 62 (1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.3917/pope.701.0015
- Turchin, P. 2003. Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical/empirical Synthesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2024. World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. https://population.un.org/wpp/assets/Files/WPP2024_Summary-of-Results.pdf
- Weeks, J.R. 2020. Population: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues, 13th edition. Cengage Learning.
- Wilmoth, J., C. Menozzi and L. Bassarsky. 2022. Why Population Growth Matters for Sustainable Development (Policy Brief 130; Future of the World). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd_2022_policy_ brief_population_growth.pdf