Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020)
Peer Reviewed Articles

Population effects of increase in world energy use and CO2 emissions: 1990–2019

Aalok Chaurasia
MLC Foundation; ‘Shyam’ Institute
Bio
This image of the cover of this issue of The Journal of Population and Sustainability has the title in block letters on a grey-green background.

Published 2020-12-01

Keywords

  • population,
  • energy use,
  • global CO2 emissions

How to Cite

Chaurasia, A. (2020). Population effects of increase in world energy use and CO2 emissions: 1990–2019. Journal of Population and Sustainability, 5(1), 87–125. https://doi.org/10.3197/jps.2020.5.1.87

Abstract

This paper analyses population effects of increase in world energy use and CO2 emissions between 1990–2019 following a decomposition framework with interaction effects. The analysis has also been carried out for the 44 countries which accounted for most of the increase in world energy use and CO2 emissions during 1990–2019. Population growth was found to have a significant effect on both the increase in energy use and CO2 emissions at the global level, although the contribution of population growth to these increases has varied widely across countries. There is a need for integrating population factors in the sustainable development processes, particularly efforts directed towards environmental sustainability.

References

  1. Ang, B.W., 2004. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy, 32(9), pp.1131–1139.
  2. Ang, B.W., 2005. The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy Policy, 33(7), pp.867–871.
  3. Ang, B.W., 2015. LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy, 86, pp.233–238.
  4. Ang, B.W., Liu, F.L., 2001. A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy, 26(6), pp.537–548.
  5. Bacon, R.W., Bhattacharya, S., 2007. Growth and CO2 emissions: how do different countries fare? [pdf] Environment working paper series; no. 113 Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/428491468313823347/Growth-and-CO2-emissions-how-do-differentcountries-fare [Accessed 4 October 2020].
  6. Batero, G., 1589. The reasons of the state. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
  7. Chaurasia A.R. [Ranjan, A.], 2009. An empirical analysis of environmental impact of population affluence and technology. In: S. Somayaji and G. Somayaji, eds. 2009. Environmental concerns and sustainable development. some perspectives from India. New Delhi: Tata Energy Resources Institute.
  8. Chaurasia, A.R., 2017. Decomposition of body mass growth into linear and ponderal growth in children with application to India. British Journal of Nutrition, 117(3), pp. 113-121.
  9. Chaurasia, A.R., 2019. Economic growth and population transition in India, 20012011. Demography India, 48(1), pp.1-18.
  10. Chaurasia, A.R., 2020. Economic growth and population transition in China and India. China Population and Development Studies (Forthcoming).
  11. Chen, J., Gao, M., Li, D., Song, M., Xie, Q., Jhou, J., 2020. Extended yearly LMDI approaches: a case study of energy consumption. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9207896.
  12. Chertow, M., 2001. The IPAT equation and its variants: changing views of technology and environmental impact. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4, pp, 13-29.
  13. Cole, M., Rayner, A.J., Bates, J.M., 1997. The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), pp. 401–416.
  14. Cole, M.A., Neumayer, E., 2004. Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Population and Environment, 26, pp.5-21.
  15. Dietz, T., Rosa, E.A., 1994. Rethinking the environmental effects of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1, pp.277-300.
  16. Dietz, T., Rosa, E.A., York, R., 2007. Driving the human ecological footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 5(1), pp.13-18.
  17. Durand, J.D., 1948. The labor force in United States: 1890–1960. New York: Social Science Research Council.
  18. Ehrlich, P.R., 1968. The population bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.
  19. Enerdata, 2020. Global energy statistical yearbook. [online] Enerdata SA. Avaliable at: https://yearbook.enerdata.net/ [Accessed 20 September 2020].
  20. Forrester, J., 1971. World dynamics. Cambridge: Wright-Allen Press.
  21. Hammond, G.P., Norman, J.B., 2012 Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from UK manufacturing. Energy, 41(1), pp.220–227.
  22. Horvitz, C., Schemske, D.W., Caswell, H., 1997. The relative “importance” of life-history stages to population growth: prospective and retrospective analyses. In: S. Tuljapurkar and H. Caswell, eds. 1997. Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems. London: Chapman and Hall. pp.247–271.
  23. Kaya, Y., 1990. Impact of carbon dioxide emissions control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup. Paris, Response Strategies Working Group.
  24. Kim, H.J, Fay, M.P., Feuer, E.J., Midthude, D.N. 2000. Permutation tests for joinpoint regress with application to cancer rates. Statistics in Medicine, 19, pp. 335-351.
  25. Kim, Y.J., Strobino, D.M., 1984. Decomposition of the difference between two rates with hierarchical effects. Demography, 21(3), pp. 361-372.
  26. Kopnina, H., Washington, H., 2016. Discussing why population growth is still ignored or denied. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 14(2), pp.133-143.
  27. Kumbaroglu, G., 2011. A sectoral decomposition analysis of Turkish CO2 emissions over 1990–2007. Energy, 36 (5), pp.2419–2433.
  28. Maddison, A., 2001. The world economy: a millennial perspective. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  29. Malthus, T.R., 1960 [1798]. On population. New York: Modern Library.
  30. Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., Behrens, W.W., 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
  31. National Cancer Institute, 2013. Joinpoint regression program. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Health and Human Services.
  32. Onanuga, O.T., 2017. Elasticity of CO2 emissions with respect to income, population and energy use: time series evidence from African countries. Economic Alternatives, 4, pp.651-670.
  33. O’Neill, B.C., Chen, B.S., 2002. Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States. In: W. Lutz, A. Praskavetz, W.C. Sanderson, eds. 2002. Population and environment: methods of analysis. New York: Population Council.
  34. Pace, J.B., 1971. Some implications of zero population growth. California Medicine, 115(6), pp.50.
  35. Peterson, E.W.F., 2017. The role of population in economic growth. Sage Open, October- December 2017, pp.1-15.
  36. Piketty, T., 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  37. Piketty, T., 2015. About capital in the twenty-first century. American Economic Review, 105(5), pp.48-53.
  38. Preston, S.H., 1994. Population and environment: from Rio to Cairo. IUSSP distinguished lecture on population and development. Liege, Belgium: IUSSP.
  39. Preston, S.H., Heuveline, P., Guillot, M., 2001. Demography. measuring and modelling population processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  40. Rees, M., Osborne, C.P., Woodward, F.I., Hulme, S.P., Turnbull, L.A., Taylor, S.H., 2010. Partitioning the components of relative growth rate: how important is plant size variation? The American Naturalist, 176(6).
  41. Rees, M., Grubb, P.J., Kelly, D., 1996. Quantifying the impact of competition and spatial heterogeneity on the structure and dynamics of a four-species guild of winter annuals. American Naturalist, 147(1), pp.1–32.
  42. Shi, A., 2003. The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975-1996: evidence from global cross-country data. Ecological Economics, 44(1), pp.24-42.
  43. Suri, V., Chapman, D., 1998. Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 25, pp.195-208.
  44. United Nations, 1973. Population theory. In: United Nations, 1973. The determinants and consequences of population trends. New York: Department of International Economic and Social Affairs.
  45. United Nations, 2000. United nations millennium declaration. [online] New York: United Nations. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Millennium.aspx. [Accessed 4 October 2020].
  46. United Nations, 2015. Transforming our World: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. [pdf] New York: United Nations. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf [Accessed 4 October 2020]
  47. United Nations, 2019. World population prospects: The 2019 revision, population database. [online] Available at: http://esa.un.org/unpp/ [Accessed 20 September 2020].
  48. United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change, 2009. UNFCCC resource guide for preparing the national communications of non-annex I parties module 3: national greenhouse gas inventories. [pdf] Bonn: UNFCCC. Available at: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/09_resource_guide3.pdf [Accessed 4 October 2020]
  49. United Nations Population Fund, 2014. Programme of action of the international conference on population development. 20th anniversary edition. [pdf] New York: United Nations Population Fund. Available at: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/programme_of_action_Web%20ENGLISH.pdf [Accessed 4 October 2020]
  50. Waggoner, P.E., Ausubel, J.H., 2002. A framework for sustainability sciences: a renovated IPAT indentity. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), pp.7860-7865.
  51. Webber, H., Sciubba, J.D., 2019. The effect of population growth on the environment. Evidence from European regions. European Journal of Population, 35(2), pp.379-462.
  52. World Bank, 2017. World development indicators. [online] Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators [Accessed 4 October 2020].
  53. York, R., Rosa, E.A., Dietz, T., 2003. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytical tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), pp.351-365.