Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Peer Reviewed Articles

A new definition of global overpopulation, explained and applied

Philip Cafaro
Colorado State University

Published 2026-01-29

How to Cite

Cafaro, Philip. 2026. “A New Definition of Global Overpopulation, Explained and Applied”. The Journal of Population and Sustainability 10 (1):17-51. https://doi.org/10.3197/whpjps.63887831800453.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Angus, I., and S. Butler. 2011. Too Many People? Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
  2. Arrhenius, G., et al. 2024. Sustainable Population in the Time of Climate Change. Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies.
  3. Asafu-Adjaye, J., et al. 2015. An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Berkeley: Breakthrough Institute.
  4. Attenborough, D. 2011. ‘Impact of population growth on the planet’. Lecture to the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, London.
  5. Bajaj, N., et al. 2024. ‘Confronting the United Nations’ pro-growth agenda: A call to reverse ecological overshoot’. The Journal of Population and Sustainability 8 (2): 15–44. https://doi.org/10.3197/JPS.63799977346495
  6. Benatar, D. 2008. Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Bourban, M. 2019. ‘Croissance démographique et changement climatique: Repenser nos politiques dans le cadre des limites planétaires’. La Pensée Écologique 1 (3): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.3917/lpe.003.0019
  8. Bradshaw, C., and B. Brook. 2014. ‘Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (46): 16610–16615. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410465111
  9. Bradshaw, C., et al. 2021. ‘Underestimating the challenges of avoiding a ghastly future’. Frontiers in Conservation Science 1: 615419. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fcosc.2020.615419
  10. Broome, J. 2012. Climate Matters. New York: Norton.
  11. Brown, W., and K. Hardee. 2024. ‘Can the International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action and Cairo Consensus normalize the discourse on population?’ Global Health: Science and Practice 12: e2400121. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00121
  12. Cafaro, P. 2004. Thoreau’s Living Ethics: Walden and the Pursuit of Virtue. Athens: University of Georgia Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book11532
  13. Cafaro, P. 2015. ‘Three ways to think about the sixth mass extinction’. Biological Conservation 192: 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.017
  14. Cafaro, P. 2021. ‘Just population policies for an overpopulated world’. Ecological Citizen 5 (1): 55–64.
  15. Cafaro, P. 2022. ‘Reducing human numbers and the size of our economies is necessary to avoid a mass extinction and share Earth justly with other species’. Philosophia 50: 2263–2282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00497-w
  16. Cafaro, P. 2026 (forthcoming). ‘Too many people: Applying IPAT in an overpopulated world’. In T. Ruuska and T. Nyfors (eds), Sufficiency: From Growth and Overshoot to Enoughness, pp. 173–205. Leiden: Brill.
  17. Cafaro, P., and J. O’Sullivan. 2019. ‘How should ecological citizens think about immigration?’ Ecological Citizen 3: 85–92.
  18. Cafaro, P., et al. 2022. ‘Overpopulation is a major cause of biodiversity loss and smaller human populations are necessary to preserve what is left’. Biological Conservation 272: 109646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109646
  19. Cafaro, P., et al. 2023. ‘Population effects on biodiversity and climate change: Evidence from recent scientific literature, 2010–2022’. Indian Journal of Population and Development 3: 149–206.
  20. Ceballos, C., et al. 2015. ‘Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction’. Science Advances 1: e1400253. https://doi. org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
  21. Chapron, G., et al. 2014. ‘Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes’. Science 346: 1517–1519.
  22. Cioran, E.M. 2013. The Trouble with Being Born. New York: Arcade Publishers.
  23. Cohen, J., 1996. How Many People Can the Earth Support? New York: WW Norton.
  24. Conly, S. 2016. One Child: Do We have a Right to More? New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190203436.001.0001
  25. Coole, D. 2018. Should We Control World Population? Cambridge: Polity Press.
  26. Crist, E. 2019. Abundant Earth: Toward an Ecological Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226596945.001.0001
  27. Crist, E., et al. 2017. ‘The interaction of human population, food production, and biodiversity protection’. Science 356: 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aal2011
  28. Crist, E., et al. 2021. ‘Protecting half the planet and transforming human systems are complementary goals’. Frontiers of Conservation Science 2: 761292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.761292
  29. Crist, E., et al. 2022. ‘Scientists’ warning on population’. Science of the Total Environment 845: 157166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157166
  30. Daly, H., and J. Farley. 2010. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Second edition. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  31. Dasgupta, P. 2019. Time and the Generations: Population Ethics for a Diminishing Planet. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dasg16012
  32. Despommier, D. 2010. The Vertical Farm: Feeding the World in the 21st Century. New York: Thomas Dunne.
  33. Diaz, S., et al. 2019. ‘Pervasive human-driven decline of life on earth points to the need for transformative change’. Science 366: 1327.
  34. Dietz, R., and D. O’Neill. 2013. Enough Is Enough: Building a Sustainable Economy in a World of Finite Resources. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  35. Dilworth, C. 2010. Too Smart for Our Own Good: The Ecological Predicament of Mankind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/BO9780511840357
  36. Dinerstein, E., et al. 2017. ‘An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm’. Bioscience 67: 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014
  37. Dodson, J., et al. 2020. ‘Population growth and climate change: Addressing the overlooked threat multiplier’. Science of the Total Environment 748: 141346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141346
  38. Donaldson, S., and W. Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
  39. Ehrlich, P., and J. Holdren. 1972. ‘Critique’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 28 (5): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1972.11457930
  40. Fleurbaey, M., et al. 2019. ‘The social cost of carbon: Valuing inequality, risk, and population for climate policy’. The Monist 102: 84–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/ monist/ony023
  41. Francis. 2015. ‘Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis: On Care for Our Common Home’. 24 May. The Vatican.
  42. Gambrel, J., and P. Cafaro. 2010. ‘The virtue of simplicity’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (1–2): 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9187-0
  43. Ganivet, E. 2019. ‘Growth in human population and consumption both need to be addressed to reach an ecologically sustainable future’. Environment, Development and Sustainability 22: 4979–4998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668019-00446-w
  44. Gerten, D., et al. 2020. ‘Feeding 10 billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries’. Nature Sustainability 3: 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41893-019-0465-1
  45. Gilens, M., and B. Page. 2014. ‘Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens’. Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595
  46. Götmark, F., and M. Andersson. 2022. ‘Achieving sustainable population: Fertility decline in many developing countries follows modern contraception, not economic growth’. Sustainable Development 31 (3): 1606–1617. https://doi. org/10.1002/sd.2470
  47. Götmark, F., et al. 2021. ‘Discussing population concepts: Overpopulation is a necessary word and an inconvenient truth’. Indian Journal of Population and Development 1 (1): 51–60.
  48. Greaves, H. 2018. ‘Optimal population size’. In G. Arrhenius, K. Bykvist and T. Campbell (eds), Oxford Handbook of Population Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Greaves, H. 2019. ‘Climate change and optimum population’. The Monist 102 (1): 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/ony021
  50. Hall, C., et al. 2017. ‘The impact of population growth and climate change on food security in Africa: Looking ahead to 2050’. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 15 (2): 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1293929
  51. Hardee, K., et al. 2013. Voluntary Family Planning Programs That Respect, Protect, and Fulfill Human Rights: A Conceptual Framework. Washington, DC: Futures Group.
  52. Hedberg, H. 2020. The Environmental The Ethics of Procreation. Abingdonhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781351037020 Impact on-Thames, of OveUK: rpopulation: Routledge.
  53. Hickel, J. 2020. Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World. London: William Heinemann.
  54. Hickey, C., et al. 2016. ‘Population engineering and the fight against climate change’. Social Theory and Practice 42 (4): 845–870. https://doi.org/10.5840/ soctheorpract201642430
  55. Higgs, K. 2017. ‘Limits to growth: Human economy and planetary boundaries’. Journal of Population and Sustainability 2 (1): 15–36. https://doi.org/10.3197/ jps.2017.2.1.15
  56. Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). 2019. ummary for Policymakers: Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat.
  57. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment, Technical Summary. IPCC Secretariat.
  58. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report. IPCC Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415416
  59. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report. IPCC Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
  60. Kallis, G. 2019. Limits: Why Malthus Was Wrong and Why Environmentalists Should Care. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503611566
  61. Kaya, Y., and K. Yokoburi. 1997. Environment, Energy, and Economy: Strategies for Sustainability. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
  62. Khalfan, A., et al. 2023. Climate Equality: A Planet for the 99%. Oxford: Oxfam International. https://doi.org/10.21201/2023.000001
  63. Kharas, H. 2017. ‘The unprecedented expansion of the global middle class: An update’. Working Paper 100. Brookings Global Economy and Development.
  64. Kortetmäki, T. 2017. Justice in and to Nature: An Application of the Broad Framework of Environmental and Ecological Justice. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 587. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
  65. Krishnadas, M., et al. 2018. ‘Parks protect forest cover in a tropical biodiversity hotspot, but high human population densities can limit success’. Biological Conservation 223: 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.034
  66. Kuhlemann, K. 2018. ‘“Any size population will do?” The fallacy of aiming for stabilization of human numbers’. The Ecological Citizen 1: 181–189.
  67. Kurtzweil, R. 2024. The Singularity Is Nearer: When We Merge with AI. New York: Viking Press.
  68. Lianos, T., and A. Pseiridis. 2016. ‘Sustainable welfare and optimum population size’. Environmental Development and Sustainability 18 (6): 1679–1699. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9711-5
  69. MacIver, C. 2015. ‘Procreation as appropriation’. In S. Hannan, S. Brennan and R. Vernon (eds), Permissible Progeny? The Morality of Procreation and Parenting, pp. 107–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780199378111.003.0005
  70. Marques, A., et al. 2019. ‘Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth’. Nature: Ecology & Evolution 3: 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0824-3
  71. McNeill, J., and P. Engelke. 2014. The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene Since 1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674970731
  72. Meijers, T. 2016. ‘Climate change and the right to one child’. In G. Bos and M. Düwell (eds), Human Rights and Sustainability, pp. 181–194. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315665320-14 Mills, S. 2003. Epicurean Simplicity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  73. Mitchell, R.B. 2012. ‘Technology is not enough: Climate change, population, affluence, and consumption’. The Journal of Environment & Development 21 (1): 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496511435670
  74. Norton, B. 1997. ‘Convergence and contextualism’. Environmental Ethics 19 (1): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199719141
  75. Nussbaum, M. 2024. Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  76. O’Neill, B.C., et al. 2012. ‘Demographic change and carbon dioxide emissions’. The Lancet 380 (9837): 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60958-1
  77. O’Sullivan, J.N. 2020. ‘The social and environmental influences of population growth rate and demographic pressure deserve greater attention in ecological economics’. Ecological Economics 172: 106648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2020.106648
  78. Overpopulation Project. 2020. ‘Rewilding success stories’. Online at https://overpopulation-project.com/rewilding-success-stories/ (accessed 4 December 4 2025).
  79. Palmer, C. 2010. Animal Ethics in Context. New York: Columbia University Press.
  80. Pereira, H., and L. Navarro (eds). 2015. Rewilding European Landscapes. Cham: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12039-3
  81. Pimm, S., et al. 2014. ‘The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection’. Science 344 (no. 6187) (art. 1246752): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752
  82. Rees, W. 2020. ‘Ecological economics for humanity’s plague phase’. Ecological Economics 169: 106519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106519
  83. Rees, W. 2023. ‘The human eco-predicament: Overshoot and the population conundrum’. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 21: 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1553/p-eznb-ekgc
  84. Reid, W.V., et al. 2005. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  85. Richardson, K., et al. 2023. ‘Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries’. Science Advances 9: eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
  86. Rieder, T. 2016. Toward a Small Family Ethic: How Overpopulation and Climate Change Are Affecting the Morality of Procreation. New York: Springer.
  87. Ripple, W., et al. 2015. ‘Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores’. Science Advances 1: e1400103. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400103
  88. Ripple, W.J., et al. 2020. ‘World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency’. BioScience 70 (1): 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz152
  89. Ritchie, H. 2024. Not the End of the World: How We Can Be the First Generation to Build a Sustainable Planet. New York: Little, Brown, Spark.
  90. Rockström, J., and M. Klum. 2015. Big World, Small Planet: Abundance within Planetary Boundaries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  91. Rockström, J., et al. 2025. ‘The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems’. The Lancet 406 (10512): 1625–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01201-2
  92. Rolston III, H. 1994. University Press. Conserving Natural Value. New York: Columbia
  93. Rolston III, H. 2020. A New Environmental Ethics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036746
  94. Rosenberg, K., et al. 2019. ‘Decline of the North American avifauna’. Science 366 (6461): 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1313
  95. Rosling, H. 2018. Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World – and Why Things Are Better Than You Think. New York: Flatiron.
  96. Sandler, R. 2012. The Ethics of Species: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139151221
  97. Sarkar, S. 2011. Environmental Philosophy: From Theory to Practice. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  98. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2010. Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
  99. Skirbekk, V. 2022. Decline and Prosper! Changing Global Birth Rates and the Advantages of Fewer Children. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-91611-4
  100. Staples, W., and P. Cafaro. 2012. ‘For a species right to exist’. In P. Cafaro and E. Crist (eds), Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation, pp. 283–300. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  101. Steffen, W., et al. 2015. ‘Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet’. Science 347: 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
  102. Steffen, W. et al. 2018. ‘Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (6223): 8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
  103. Stephens, J., et al. 2023. ‘The dangers of mainstreaming solar geoengineering: A critique of the National Academies report’. Environmental Politics 32 (1): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1989214
  104. Tamburino, L., and G. Bravo. 2021. ‘Reconciling a positive ecological balance with human development: a quantitative assessment’. Ecological Indicators 129: 107973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107973
  105. Tamburino, L., et al. 2023. ‘An analysis of three decades of increasing carbon emissions: The weight of the P factor’. Sustainability 15 (4): 3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043245
  106. Tamburino, L., et al. 2025. ‘Carbon Inequality: Resolving Contradictory Results from Two Different Approaches’. Qeios (pre-print). https://doi.org/10.32388/ CNVHVF
  107. Tucker, C. 2019. A Planet of 3 Billion. Atlas Observatory Press.
  108. Turner, N., and F. Götmark. 2023. ‘Human fertility and religions in sub-Saharan Africa: A comprehensive review of publications and data, 2010–2020’. African Journal of Reproductive Health 27 (1): 119–172.
  109. United Nations. 2024. World Population Prospects 2024. Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.
  110. van Vuuren, D., et al. 2018. ‘Alternative pathways to the 1.5 C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies’. Nature Climate Change 8: 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8
  111. Vettese, T., and D. Pendergrass. 2022. Half-Earth Socialism. London: Verso.
  112. Vollset, S., et al. 2020. ‘Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: A forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study’. The Lancet 396 (10258): 1285–1306. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30677-2
  113. Weber, H., and J. Sciubba. 2018. ‘The effect of population growth on the environment: Evidence from European regions’. European Journal of Population 35: 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9486-0
  114. Wiedmann, T., et al. 2020. ‘Scientists’ warning on affluence’. Nature Communications 11: 3107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y
  115. Wienhues, A. 2020. Ecological Justice and the Extinction Crisis: Giving Living Beings Their Due. Bristol: Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529208511.001.0001
  116. Wilson, E.O. 2016. Half Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life. New York: Norton.
  117. World Wildlife Fund. 2022. Living Planet Report 2022 – Building a Nature-Positive Society. Gland, Switzerland.