Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
Research

Electronic Life Histories: At Home with E-waste Waste Materialities and Meaning

Shannon McMullen
Purdue University
Laura Zanotti
Purdue University
H. Kory Cooper
Purdue University
Categories

Published 2019-01-25

Keywords

  • e-waste,
  • material culture,
  • waste studies,
  • interdisciplinary methods,
  • authoethnography,
  • object lessons,
  • life history,
  • behavioral archaeology,
  • affect
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

McMullen, S., Zanotti, L., & Cooper, H. K. (2019). Electronic Life Histories: At Home with E-waste Waste Materialities and Meaning. Worldwide Waste, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.5334/wwwj.15

Abstract

The interdisciplinary Electronic Life Histories Project integrates behavioral archaeology, engineering, anthropology, art, material culture, and science and technology studies to employ a life history model, community-based research and creative engagement to address the making of electronic waste. Focused in the Greater Lafayette area of Indiana, which is home to a major university, this project examines the entanglements among people, electronics and waste-making. Specifically, this paper focuses on a significant interstitial stage between reuse and discard. We consider the stories and meanings affixed to electronic objects once they have entered people’s homes, and the complex lives they have before they are discarded, reused, or repurposed. We find ‘closet fill’ or junk drawers of electronic devices, bits, bytes and peripherals are often unintentional collections that are situationally valued through a constellation of factors that include emotional attachments, technological obsolescence, imagined use-value, as well as discrepancies between perceived value and market value. While the problem of closet fill has been discussed by scholars, how electronics enter this interstitial stage, why they remain and what motivates movement out of this part of the life history of objects have not been closely examined. We suggest a life history approach can make these interstitial phases visible in a way that illuminates the key factors in keeping electronics versus discarding. As opposed to descriptions of waste as disorderly, abject, or disgusting, our work shows that objects at the interstices of wasting practices embody, represent, and express many meanings to participants socially, spatially, and structurally.