Environmental Values 9(2000): 81-89. doi: 10.3197/096327100129341985 The naive argument against moral vegetarianism claims that if it is wrong for us to eat meant then it is wrong for lions and tigers to do so as well. I argue that the fact that such carnivores lack higher order mental states and need meat to survive do suffice to undermine the naive argument.
KEYWORDS: ethics, applied ethics, vegetarianism, animal welfare, naive argument
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles:
Why the Naive Argument against Moral Vegetarianism Really is Naive David Benatar
This article is available online (PDF format) from Ingenta Journals. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values.
Reprints of this article can be ordered from the British Library Document Supply Service or ingenta
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222