Environmental Values 8(1999): 437-449. doi: 10.3197/096327199129341905
Environmentalists often argue that, in order to address fundamentally the harmful impact of their activities on the environment, western industrial societies need to change their attitude to nature. Specifically, they need to see nature as sacred, and to acknowledge that humanity is a part of nature rather than separate from it. In this paper, I seek to show that these two ideas are incompatible in the context of western culture. Drawing particularly on ideas expressed by western conservationists, I argue that nature is already seen as sacred, and that its sacredness depends on it being seen as separate from humanity, an idea which effectively contradicts the scientific knowledge on which many conservationists base their actions. Goodin's green theory of value is used as a source of ideas about why non-human nature is experienced as sacred, and can be extended to suggest that other values, such as 'development' and 'progress', are also seen as sacred.
KEYWORDS: environment, nature, sacredness, conservation, non-human nature, western culture
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles:
In Search of Value Literacy: Suggestions for the Elicitation of Environmental Values Theresa Satterfield
Nature Connoisseurship. Allan Greenbaum
Does the Idea of Wilderness Need a Defence?. Paul M. Keeling
This article is available online (PDF format) from Ingenta Journals. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values.
Reprints of this article can be ordered from the British Library Document Supply Service or ingenta
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222