Environmental Values 7(1998): 267-279. doi: 10.3197/096327198129341573
How far is it true that the aesthetic appreciation of nature obscures, rather than illuminates, its objects? Do we not humanise nature, read our own subjectivity into it, sentimentally distort it, in our aesthetic - as distinct from scientific - approaches? I argue that not all humanising falsifies, and that we can respect nature as well as annex its forms and expressive qualities in our aesthetic appreciation. Respecting/humanising are explored as two of the chief key concepts for an understanding of the complexity of aesthetic attitudes to nature.
KEYWORDS: aesthetics, nature, anthropomorphic, truth
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles:
Editorial. Emily Brady
Editorial: Ronald Hepburn and the humanising of Environmental Aesthetics. Isis Brook
Reprints of this article can be ordered from the British Library Document Supply Service or ingenta
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222