Environmental Values 3(1994): 285-310. doi: 10.3197/096327194776679638
Four dogmas have shaped modern neoclassical economics. The first proposes that markets may fail to allocate resources efficiently, that is, to those willing to pay the most for them. The second asserts that choices, particularly within markets, reveal preferences. The third is the assumption that people always make the choices they expect will benefit them or enhance their welfare. The fourth dogma holds that perfectly competitive markets will allocate resources to their most beneficial uses. This is the doctrine of the invisible hand. I argue that these dogmas of applied welfare economics should be abandoned. One consequence of doing so will be an increased interest in the institutional context of production. A second will be a turn toward empiricism.
KEYWORDS: Choices, externalities, market efficiency, preferences, welfare economics
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles:
Welfare Economic Dogmas: A Reply to Sagoff. Richard Cookson
Plural Values and Environmental Valuation. Wilfred Beckerman and Joanna Pasek
Economic Valuation and Environmental Values. Michael Prior
The Disvalue of 'Contingent Valuation' and the Problem of the 'Expectation Gap' Laura Westra
The Indifference Curve, Motivation, and Morality in Contingent Valuation Rob Hart and Uwe Latacz-Lohmann
Reprints of this article can be ordered from the British Library Document Supply Service or ingenta
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222