WHP Logo

The White Horse Press

Environmental Values

Contents of Volume 19

Other volumes of EV

Environmental Values

Animal Ethics and the Argument from Absurdity

Elisa Aaltola

Environmental Values 19 (2010): 79-98. doi: 10.3197/096327110X485392

ABSTRACT

Arguments for the inherent value, equality of interests, or rights of non-human animals have presented a strong challenge for the anthropocentric worldview. However, they have been met with criticism. One form of criticism maintains that, regardless of their theoretical consistency, these 'pro-animal arguments' cannot be accepted due to their absurdity. Often, particularly inter-species interest conflicts are brought to the fore: if pro-animal arguments were followed, we could not solve interest conflicts between species, which is absurd. Because of this absurdity, the arguments need to be abandoned. The paper analyses the strength, background and relevance of this 'argument from absurdity'. It is claimed that in all of the three areas mentioned above, the argument faces severe difficulties.


KEYWORDS

Animal ethics, rights, equality, interest conflicts, life-boat dilemma

REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:

Non-Anthropocentrism? A Killing Objection. Tony Lynch and David Wells


Download full text (PDF format) from IngentaConnect. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values.

Subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.

Other papers in this volume

THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222