Environmental Values 19 (2010): 7-31. doi: 10.3197/096327110X485365
The controversy over commercial releases of genetically modified (GM) crops demonstrates that there is a need for new approaches that are more broadly based, transparent and able to acknowledge the uncertainties involved. This article investigates whether new forms of knowledge production as prescribed in the concept of post-normal science can improve risk governance of GM crops. The GM science review carried out in the UK in 2003 serves as a case study and the focus is on how scientific uncertainty and public concern was taken into account. Some recommendations are advanced for assessing scientific uncertainty, for accommodating scientific disputes and for integrating stakeholders' interests and perspectives in relations to GM crops.
GMOs, crops, the precautionary principle, post-normal science, risk management, scientific uncertainty.
REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:
Nature Conservation and the Precautionary Principle. John M. Francis
Integrating Multiple Knowledge Systems into Environmental Decision-making: Two Case Studies of Participatory Biodiversity Initiatives in Canada and their Implications for Conceptions of Education and Public Involvement.Elin Kelsey
Scientists' Perspectives on the Deliberate Release of GM Crops. Valborg Kvakkestad, Frøydis Gillund, Kamilla Anette Kjølberg and Arild Vatn
The Precautionary Principle and the Concept of Precaution. Per Sandin
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles
Editorial: Censoring Science in Research Officially. Clive L. Spash
The Controversy over GM Canola in Australia as an Ontological Politics. Rosemary Robins
Download full text (PDF format) from IngentaConnect. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values.
Subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.Other papers in this volume
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222