Environmental Values 18 (2009): 217-236. doi: 10.3197/096327109X438071
Darwinian humanism proposes that environmental philosophers pursue their work in full recognition of an irreducible ambiguity at the heart of human experience: we may legitimately regard moral action as fully free and fully natural at the same time, since neither perspective can be taken as the whole truth. A serious objection to this proposal holds that freedom and nature may be unified as an organic whole, and their unity posited as a matter of substantive truth, by appeal to teleology. In particular, I consider Hegel's account of the emergence of Absolute Spirit, weigh its advantages and disadvantages as an approach to human moral experience and as a strategic move for environmentalists, and conclude with a refinement of Darwinian humanism and a clarification of its implications for environmental ethics.
Moral agency, teleology, phenomenology, Kant, Hegel, Darwin
REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:
Dominating Nature. Jason Brennan
Darwinian Humanism: A Proposal for Environmental Philosophy. Robert Kirkman
'The World Must be Romanticised ...': The (Environmental) Ethical Implications of Schelling's Organic Worldview.Elaine P. Miller
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles
Darwin and the Meaning in Life. Alan Holland
Download full text (PDF format) from IngentaConnect. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values.
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.Other papers in this volume
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222