Environmental Values 16(2007): 3-21. doi: 10.3197/096327107780160292
There are two distinct strands within modern philosophical ethics that are relevant to environmental philosophy: an empiricist strand that seeks a naturalist account of human conduct and a humanist strand rooted in a conception of transcendent human freedom. Each strand has its appeal, but each also raises both strategic and theoretical problems for environmental philosophers. Based on a reading of Kant's critical solution to the antinomy of freedom and nature, I recommend that environmental philosophers consider the possibility of a Darwinian humanism, through which moral agents are understood as both free and causally intertwined with the natural world.
KEYWORDS: Moral agency, empiricism, humanism, phenomenology, Kant, Darwin
REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:
Is Environmentalism a Humanism? Lewis P. Hinchman
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles
Darwinian Humanism and the End of Nature. Robert Kirkman
Download full text (PDF format) from IngentaConnect. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values.
Subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.Other papers in this volume
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222