Environmental Values 13(2004): 243-260. doi: 10.3197/0963271041159886
This paper discusses the impacts of different formal and informal institutions upon the Regional Forest Programme of Southwest Finland (1997-2001). The divide between formal and informal institutions is a binary distinction: it is used as a discursive tool for identifying social structures and processes and for articulating their significance in development and environmental planning, valuation and decision-making. In the end part of the paper, there is a brief discussion of how normative and moral issues can be explicitly and more creatively integrated into the practice of environmental policy.
KEYWORDS: Formal and informal institutions, institutional economics, environmental planning, reasonable value
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles
Contestations Over Biodiversity Protection: Considering Peircean Semiosis. Juha Hiedanpää and Daniel W. Bromley
This article is available online (PDF format) from Ingenta Journals. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values. Reprints of this article can be ordered from ingenta or the British Library
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222