Environmental Values 12(2003): 3-28. doi: 10.3197/096327103129341207
In this paper, I explore some parallels and dissimilarities between aesthetic appreciation that takes as its focus art objects and that which focuses on natural objects. I cover three areas. The first deals with general approach, whether a paradigm of engagement is more appropriate to environmental aesthetics than one of detachment and disinterest. The second theme is about preservation and whether the appropriate model is static or dynamic. The final theme is about environmental criticism and the application of aesthetic theory to arguments for preservation.
KEYWORDS: art, environmental aesthetics, environmental criticism, Nature, North America, sense of place
REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:
Beauty for Ever? Keekok Lee
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles:
Editorial. Emily Brady
This article is available online (PDF format) from Ingenta Journals. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values. Reprints of this article can be ordered from ingenta or the British Library
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222