Environmental Values 1(1992): 123-132. doi: 10.3197/096327192776680151
Should environmental philosophers - or practical conservationists - focus their attentions on particular living creatures, or on the community of which they, and we, are part? The individualist ethos of the United States is reflected in legislation to protect endangered species in which particular species are portrayed as individuals with rights that must be protected. By contrast, the planning of environmental protection in Norway, exemplified by the Samla Plan for the management of water resources, emphasizes the importance of community integrity, where 'community' includes the whole of nature. These differing approaches are considered in the light of moral monism and pluralism, with special reference to Christopher Stone's recent work. Despite their differences, and the reservation that each method inevitably takes a human perspective, it can be hoped that each may contribute to enabling people and political systems to consider nature more seriously.
KEYWORDS: ecophilosophy, endangered species act, environmental assessment, moral pluralism, Samla Plan
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles:
Economic Stratification and Environmental Management: A Case Study of the New York City Catskill/Delaware Watershed. Joan Hoffman
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222